Thursday, March 26, 2020
Female Genital Mutation Essays - Medicine, Clinical Medicine, Health
  Female Genital Mutation    Struggling against genital mutilation in Sudan    In the country of Sudan, in Northern Africa, there is a procedure that is  tradition and is performed on most women called female genital mutilation, or    FGM, which used to be known as female circumcision. It has been a normal  practice for generations, but is now the subject for international controversy  on the morality and safety of this procedure. It is now known that 82 percent of    Sudanese woman have an extreme form of genital mutilation done on them, normally  at a young age. This form of mutilation is called the Pharaonic form and  includes the total removal of the clitoris and labia, and stitching together of  the vulva, leaving only a small hole for urination and menstrual cycle. This is  normally done without any type of anaesthetic or professional medical care.    There is also a more moderate form of mutilation, called Sunni, where only the  covering of the clitoris is removed. This practice started and became tradition  in foreign countries in order to ensure that women practice chaste behavior, and  to suppress female sexuality. It has also been attributed to religious beliefs  of monogamy although most religions do not support this type of practice. In  today's society it has become more of a traditional and social norm, and has  less to do with religious beliefs. This problem is not only in Sudan; it is  practiced in the majority of the continent of Africa as well as other countries.    In other cultures, such as Australian aborigines, genital mutilation is a part  of the rite of passage into maturation, and is done on both men and women (Bodley,  p. 58). FGM has often been referred to as female circumcision and compared to  male circumcision. However, such comparison is often misleading. Both practices  include the removal of well- functioning parts of the genitalia and are quite  unnecessary. However, FGM is far more drastic and damaging than male  circumcision because it is extremely dangerous and painful. It is believed that  two thirds of these procedures are done by untrained birth attendants, who have  little knowledge of health. They are often unconcerned with hygiene, and many  use instruments that are not cleaned or disinfected properly. Instruments such  as razor blades, scissors, kitchen knives, and pieces of glass are commonly  used. These instruments are frequently used on several girls in succession and  are rarely cleaned, causing the transmission of a variety of viruses such as the    HIV virus, and other infections. There are many side effects of this procedure  including trauma, stress or shock from the extreme pain; and bleeding,  hemorrhaging and infections that can be fatal from improperly cleaned  instruments. There can also be painful and difficult sexual relations and  obstructed childbirth. The effects of this one procedure can last a lifetime,  both physically and pyschologically. Today, 85 to 114 million girls and women in  more than 30 countries have been subjected to some form of genital mutilation.    It was declared illegal in Sudan in 1941, although that did little to stop this  age-old tradition. To this day, about 90% of women are still being subjected to  the mutilation, especially if it is a family tradition. In various cultures  there are many "justifications" for these practices. Many older women  feel that if they have an uncircumcised daughter, she will not be able to find a  husband and will become a social outcast. Family honor, cleanliness, protection  against spells, insurance of virginity and faithfulness to the husband, or  simply terrorizing women out of sex are sometimes used as excuses for the  practice of FGM. Examples similar to this are found in other cultures, such as  the Maasai, an African cattle peoples tribe. A clitoridectomy is performed on  adolescent girls in this tribe as part of their rite of passage, and signifies  that they are ready for marriage. This practice is openly accepted by these  women as another ritual and a normal precondition of marriage (Bodley, p. 121).    The efforts to stop procedures of this kind are mounting though, especially with  the help of women ages 16 to 30 who realize the dangers of this practice. These  women can help to save their daughters and many other women from this if they  are educated of the dangers. It ends up damaging their health, as well as their  socio-economic lives; which is why it needs to be put to a stop. It is also  unnecessary in today's society. These women have joined together to create the    Sudan National Committee on Harmful Traditional Practices, and are now working  to eliminate    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.